<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 564 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437757</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed that prior to 01.04.2011, trading activities were not eligible for CENVAT credit. The appellants&#039; appeal was partly allowed for quantification of recoverable CENVAT credit, with credit for manufacturing upheld and trading activities disallowed. Penalties were reduced due to conflicting judgments, with penalties confirmed at specified amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 08:23:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 564 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437757</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed that prior to 01.04.2011, trading activities were not eligible for CENVAT credit. The appellants&#039; appeal was partly allowed for quantification of recoverable CENVAT credit, with credit for manufacturing upheld and trading activities disallowed. Penalties were reduced due to conflicting judgments, with penalties confirmed at specified amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>