<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1408 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307880</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the appellant&#039;s method for benchmarking the charter hire/lease rent and deleting the additions related to management service fees and reimbursement of salary. The grounds not pressed by the appellant were dismissed, and certain issues were restored to the file of the DRP for adjudication on merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 May 2023 12:55:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1408 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307880</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the appellant&#039;s method for benchmarking the charter hire/lease rent and deleting the additions related to management service fees and reimbursement of salary. The grounds not pressed by the appellant were dismissed, and certain issues were restored to the file of the DRP for adjudication on merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>