<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1698 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307879</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the management service fees received were not taxable as &quot;royalty&quot; under the India-Netherlands DTAA. The payments were considered reimbursements of cost rather than royalty, as the services provided did not involve the transfer of technical knowledge or know-how. The Tribunal allowed grounds 1 to 6 of the appeal in favor of the assessee, while grounds 7 to 9 were dismissed as not pressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 May 2023 12:55:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1698 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307879</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the management service fees received were not taxable as &quot;royalty&quot; under the India-Netherlands DTAA. The payments were considered reimbursements of cost rather than royalty, as the services provided did not involve the transfer of technical knowledge or know-how. The Tribunal allowed grounds 1 to 6 of the appeal in favor of the assessee, while grounds 7 to 9 were dismissed as not pressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>