<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1920 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307878</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of fabrication charges, allowing the entire amount as genuine business expenses. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition on account of unaccounted scrap, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence to support the Revenue&#039;s estimation. The final order favored the assessee, with the Revenue&#039;s appeal being dismissed and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 May 2023 12:55:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1920 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307878</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of fabrication charges, allowing the entire amount as genuine business expenses. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition on account of unaccounted scrap, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence to support the Revenue&#039;s estimation. The final order favored the assessee, with the Revenue&#039;s appeal being dismissed and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>