https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307885 Casual workers engaged for race-day work were held to fall within the wide definition of "employee" under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, because the Act covers persons employed for wages in connection with an establishment even if engaged only for part of a wage period. The statutory coverage, read with the contribution scheme and the 18.9.1978 notification, justified recovery of contribution from 1978-79 rather than confining liability to 1987. Consent terms could not override a statutory notification or defeat the demand, so the Turf Club remained liable to contribute with interest. en-us Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 14 May 2023 12:55:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307885 Casual workers engaged for race-day work were held to fall within the wide definition of "employee" under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, because the Act covers persons employed for wages in connection with an establishment even if engaged only for part of a wage period. The statutory coverage, read with the contribution scheme and the 18.9.1978 notification, justified recovery of contribution from 1978-79 rather than confining liability to 1987. Consent terms could not override a statutory notification or defeat the demand, so the Turf Club remained liable to contribute with interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307885