<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 779 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307876</link>
    <description>A prospective amendment to the West Bengal Sales Tax Act&#039;s definition of &quot;manufacture&quot; could validly end the assessee&#039;s exemption for the unexpired period of its eligibility certificate from the date the amendment took effect. The earlier benefit was not withdrawn retrospectively; only future entitlement was affected. Exemption under a fiscal statute is a concession, not an irrevocable right, and promissory estoppel does not ordinarily prevent legislative alteration of a tax scheme. As the statutory scheme contained no express protection preserving the exemption after amendment, the assessee had no vested or accrued right to continue it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 May 2023 11:53:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 779 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307876</link>
      <description>A prospective amendment to the West Bengal Sales Tax Act&#039;s definition of &quot;manufacture&quot; could validly end the assessee&#039;s exemption for the unexpired period of its eligibility certificate from the date the amendment took effect. The earlier benefit was not withdrawn retrospectively; only future entitlement was affected. Exemption under a fiscal statute is a concession, not an irrevocable right, and promissory estoppel does not ordinarily prevent legislative alteration of a tax scheme. As the statutory scheme contained no express protection preserving the exemption after amendment, the assessee had no vested or accrued right to continue it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>