<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 524 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437717</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the penalties imposed on cable TV operators for Service Tax under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039;. The Appellate Authority upheld the Service Tax but reduced the penalty to the extent of the penalty already deposited by the appellants. The Tribunal extended the benefits of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, to the appellants, concluding that the penalties imposed were not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 22:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 524 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437717</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the penalties imposed on cable TV operators for Service Tax under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039;. The Appellate Authority upheld the Service Tax but reduced the penalty to the extent of the penalty already deposited by the appellants. The Tribunal extended the benefits of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, to the appellants, concluding that the penalties imposed were not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>