https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437711 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that they did not qualify as "job workers" under Rule 10A of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The Tribunal determined that the appellants did not manufacture goods on behalf of M/s Nilkamal Limited and that the goods were not made from inputs supplied by the company. As a result, the demands and penalties imposed on the appellants were set aside, with similar decisions made in cases involving other suppliers of M/s Nilkamal Limited. The judgment was delivered on 12.05.2023. en-us Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 May 2023 18:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437711 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that they did not qualify as "job workers" under Rule 10A of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The Tribunal determined that the appellants did not manufacture goods on behalf of M/s Nilkamal Limited and that the goods were not made from inputs supplied by the company. As a result, the demands and penalties imposed on the appellants were set aside, with similar decisions made in cases involving other suppliers of M/s Nilkamal Limited. The judgment was delivered on 12.05.2023. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437711