<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 517 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437710</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged a demand under Cenvat Credit Rules related to liability for 5% of the sale value of bagasse due to failure to maintain separate accounts. The Supreme Court clarified that bagasse, classified under the Central Excise Tariff Act, does not attract excise duty as it is agricultural waste without a manufacturing process. The Court&#039;s decision set a precedent, leading to the allowance of the appeal and providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 May 2023 08:03:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 517 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437710</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged a demand under Cenvat Credit Rules related to liability for 5% of the sale value of bagasse due to failure to maintain separate accounts. The Supreme Court clarified that bagasse, classified under the Central Excise Tariff Act, does not attract excise duty as it is agricultural waste without a manufacturing process. The Court&#039;s decision set a precedent, leading to the allowance of the appeal and providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>