https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437703 The Court determined that the High Court failed to conclusively decide on the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement at the pre-referral stage, as required under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Amendment Act, 2015. Consequently, the case was remitted to the High Court to reassess the arbitration petitions, focusing specifically on the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement. The Court abstained from expressing any opinion on the merits of the arbitration agreement or the interconnectedness of the agreements, leaving these determinations to the High Court. The High Court is directed to resolve the matter within three months. en-us Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Nov 2024 10:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437703 The Court determined that the High Court failed to conclusively decide on the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement at the pre-referral stage, as required under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Amendment Act, 2015. Consequently, the case was remitted to the High Court to reassess the arbitration petitions, focusing specifically on the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement. The Court abstained from expressing any opinion on the merits of the arbitration agreement or the interconnectedness of the agreements, leaving these determinations to the High Court. The High Court is directed to resolve the matter within three months. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437703