<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1633 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307861</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition of Rs. 14,19,57,154 on account of the difference between the market value and cost of shares upon conversion from stock-in-trade to investment. The Tribunal restricted the disallowance under Section 14A to the exempt income earned by the assessee, i.e., Rs. 10,35,890, following the principle that disallowance should not exceed the exempt income. The appeal of the Revenue and the cross-objection of the assessee were both partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 21:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1633 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307861</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition of Rs. 14,19,57,154 on account of the difference between the market value and cost of shares upon conversion from stock-in-trade to investment. The Tribunal restricted the disallowance under Section 14A to the exempt income earned by the assessee, i.e., Rs. 10,35,890, following the principle that disallowance should not exceed the exempt income. The appeal of the Revenue and the cross-objection of the assessee were both partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>