<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1978 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307860</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer/TPO to accept the benchmarking under the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method after verification. The additions on account of management services fee and reimbursement of salary were deleted. The levy of interest under section 234B was also struck down based on the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 21:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1978 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307860</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer/TPO to accept the benchmarking under the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method after verification. The additions on account of management services fee and reimbursement of salary were deleted. The levy of interest under section 234B was also struck down based on the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>