<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1375 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307868</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of by the Tribunal, granting the Appellant liberty to raise objections regarding the approval of the Resolution Plan during the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s consideration. The Tribunal noted the rejection of the initial application due to the absence of the Appellant and the subsequent request&#039;s dismissal for lack of locus and merit. The Tribunal did not entertain the appeal at that stage, emphasizing that the Application for approval of the Resolution Plan was pending before the Adjudicating Authority. The Appellant was allowed to file objections to the approved plan by the following day.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 21:13:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1375 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307868</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of by the Tribunal, granting the Appellant liberty to raise objections regarding the approval of the Resolution Plan during the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s consideration. The Tribunal noted the rejection of the initial application due to the absence of the Appellant and the subsequent request&#039;s dismissal for lack of locus and merit. The Tribunal did not entertain the appeal at that stage, emphasizing that the Application for approval of the Resolution Plan was pending before the Adjudicating Authority. The Appellant was allowed to file objections to the approved plan by the following day.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>