https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307859 The court allowed the petition, quashing the summoning order and criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 against the petitioners. The inadvertent non-impleadment of the Business Manager was rectified by amending the memo of parties to include them individually. The court clarified that liability under Section 138 is not based on negligence and requires specific grounds, which were not met in this case due to the error in issuing the cheque following an account attachment. en-us Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 May 2023 18:39:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307859 The court allowed the petition, quashing the summoning order and criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 against the petitioners. The inadvertent non-impleadment of the Business Manager was rectified by amending the memo of parties to include them individually. The court clarified that liability under Section 138 is not based on negligence and requires specific grounds, which were not met in this case due to the error in issuing the cheque following an account attachment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307859