<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Reviews Petition on Constitutional Validity of GST Anti-Profiteering Section 171; No Urgency for Interim Order Found.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69738</link>
    <description>Anti profiteering - Stay on the order of the authority - Constitutional validity of Section 171 - There could not be any urgency for granting any interim order since the petitioner was sitting over the aforesaid impugned adjudication order for the last six months. - Since the constitutional validity of the aforesaid provisions of law has been challenged, this writ petition is entertained. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 14:01:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 14:01:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Reviews Petition on Constitutional Validity of GST Anti-Profiteering Section 171; No Urgency for Interim Order Found.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69738</link>
      <description>Anti profiteering - Stay on the order of the authority - Constitutional validity of Section 171 - There could not be any urgency for granting any interim order since the petitioner was sitting over the aforesaid impugned adjudication order for the last six months. - Since the constitutional validity of the aforesaid provisions of law has been challenged, this writ petition is entertained. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 14:01:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>