<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 117 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32704</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for condonation of delay, recalling the dismissal order and restoring Stay Petitions and Appeals. The Tribunal decided to hear and dispose of the Appeals without pre-deposit of demands. The appellant sought remand to provide evidence supporting the proportionality of the demanded service tax amount. The Tribunal set aside the impugned Orders, remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Commissioner to allow the appellant to produce evidence for quantifying the Service Tax based on consulting engineering service charges. All Appeals were allowed by way of remand, ensuring a fair process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 117 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32704</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for condonation of delay, recalling the dismissal order and restoring Stay Petitions and Appeals. The Tribunal decided to hear and dispose of the Appeals without pre-deposit of demands. The appellant sought remand to provide evidence supporting the proportionality of the demanded service tax amount. The Tribunal set aside the impugned Orders, remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Commissioner to allow the appellant to produce evidence for quantifying the Service Tax based on consulting engineering service charges. All Appeals were allowed by way of remand, ensuring a fair process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>