<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 478 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437671</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner were not sustainable. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant&#039;s consistent income disclosure, legitimate business activities, and availability of unutilized funds. It referred to similar cases where closing balances were deemed disclosed income, leading to the deletion of the additions in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 08:28:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 478 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437671</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner were not sustainable. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant&#039;s consistent income disclosure, legitimate business activities, and availability of unutilized funds. It referred to similar cases where closing balances were deemed disclosed income, leading to the deletion of the additions in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>