<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 280 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32700</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the application for stay on the Commissioner (Appeals) order allowing Cenvat credit on service tax paid for security services in a residential colony. The decision was based on precedent allowing credit for input services related to residential colony management. The Tribunal found the credit for security services arguable and not clearly inadmissible, leading to the rejection of the stay application, essentially allowing the appeal itself.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 280 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32700</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the application for stay on the Commissioner (Appeals) order allowing Cenvat credit on service tax paid for security services in a residential colony. The decision was based on precedent allowing credit for input services related to residential colony management. The Tribunal found the credit for security services arguable and not clearly inadmissible, leading to the rejection of the stay application, essentially allowing the appeal itself.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>