<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 455 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437648</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the impugned order imposing penalties on the appellant and other co-noticees was not valid. The appellant was entitled to the immunity granted by the Settlement Commission to the main noticee. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was granted consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 19:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 455 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437648</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the impugned order imposing penalties on the appellant and other co-noticees was not valid. The appellant was entitled to the immunity granted by the Settlement Commission to the main noticee. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was granted consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>