<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Finds Freeze Order on Company&#039;s Properties Unnecessary, Not Linked to Alleged Crime or Mentioned in FIR.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69717</link>
    <description>Validity of Second Freeze Order - Since the appellant company is not connected to the alleged crime, and has not found mention in the FIR or the chargesheet, the freeze order against the appellant company’s properties is redundant qua the investigation, since the appellant company itself is not necessary for the conclusion of the investigation. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 08:26:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 08:26:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Finds Freeze Order on Company&#039;s Properties Unnecessary, Not Linked to Alleged Crime or Mentioned in FIR.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69717</link>
      <description>Validity of Second Freeze Order - Since the appellant company is not connected to the alleged crime, and has not found mention in the FIR or the chargesheet, the freeze order against the appellant company’s properties is redundant qua the investigation, since the appellant company itself is not necessary for the conclusion of the investigation. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 08:26:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>