<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 441 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437634</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the revenue appeal because the tax effect was stated to be below the monetary limit prescribed in the applicable litigation policy circular. The order reflects that, where the prescribed threshold is not met, the appeal is not pursued on merits and is terminated on that ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 441 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437634</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the revenue appeal because the tax effect was stated to be below the monetary limit prescribed in the applicable litigation policy circular. The order reflects that, where the prescribed threshold is not met, the appeal is not pursued on merits and is terminated on that ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>