<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 438 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437631</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked by the revenue. The demand was found to be barred by limitation as there was no evidence of deliberate misstatement or suppression of facts by the assessee. The Court emphasized the significance of factual examination in tax-related legal matters and affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 08:26:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 438 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437631</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked by the revenue. The demand was found to be barred by limitation as there was no evidence of deliberate misstatement or suppression of facts by the assessee. The Court emphasized the significance of factual examination in tax-related legal matters and affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>