https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437619 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the pre-Amendment Act, 2015 should apply to a Section 11(6) application under the Arbitration Act, 1996, when the notice invoking arbitration was issued before the Amendment Act but the application was filed after the Amendment Act came into force. The Court clarified the interpretation of Section 26 of the Amendment Act, 2015, stating it applies prospectively to court proceedings initiated after its commencement date. Previous judgments like BCCI v. Kochi Cricket were distinguished, with the Court emphasizing the relevance of Parmar Construction Company's interpretation for Section 11(6) applications. en-us Tue, 09 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 May 2023 15:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437619 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the pre-Amendment Act, 2015 should apply to a Section 11(6) application under the Arbitration Act, 1996, when the notice invoking arbitration was issued before the Amendment Act but the application was filed after the Amendment Act came into force. The Court clarified the interpretation of Section 26 of the Amendment Act, 2015, stating it applies prospectively to court proceedings initiated after its commencement date. Previous judgments like BCCI v. Kochi Cricket were distinguished, with the Court emphasizing the relevance of Parmar Construction Company's interpretation for Section 11(6) applications. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437619