https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437617 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's award, finding no error or illegality in the interpretation of the contract. The Court emphasized limited interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petition was dismissed, and the Tribunal's decision awarding the claimant reimbursement for taxes and duties on Bought Out Products (BOP) items, along with interest and costs, was upheld. en-us Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 May 2023 17:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437617 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's award, finding no error or illegality in the interpretation of the contract. The Court emphasized limited interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petition was dismissed, and the Tribunal's decision awarding the claimant reimbursement for taxes and duties on Bought Out Products (BOP) items, along with interest and costs, was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437617