<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1888 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307848</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, emphasizing the intentional misrepresentation of income by the assessee. The decision highlighted the importance of accurate income disclosure and the consequences of concealing income to evade tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 21:19:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1888 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307848</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, emphasizing the intentional misrepresentation of income by the assessee. The decision highlighted the importance of accurate income disclosure and the consequences of concealing income to evade tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>