https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307831 The court dismissed the contempt petition, ruling that the respondents did not willfully disobey the court's order dated 8th September 2015. The court clarified that the observations in the order were not enforceable commands and that the provisions of SICA do not extend to properties outside India. Emphasizing the high standard of proof required in contempt proceedings, the court found that the petitioner failed to establish willful disobedience by the respondents. en-us Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 May 2023 16:45:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307831 The court dismissed the contempt petition, ruling that the respondents did not willfully disobey the court's order dated 8th September 2015. The court clarified that the observations in the order were not enforceable commands and that the provisions of SICA do not extend to properties outside India. Emphasizing the high standard of proof required in contempt proceedings, the court found that the petitioner failed to establish willful disobedience by the respondents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307831