https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307835 Acceptance of the final bill with a no further claim certificate was treated as accord and satisfaction, leaving no surviving arbitral dispute. In a Section 11 request, the Court could examine whether the claim had already been concluded and whether coercion or undue influence was prima facie established. Because the allegation of coercion was unsupported by contemporaneous correspondence, specific pleadings, or prompt protest, it was found to be only a bald assertion raised in the affidavit. The objection based on full and final settlement therefore succeeded, and appointment of an arbitrator was refused. en-us Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 May 2023 16:45:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307835 Acceptance of the final bill with a no further claim certificate was treated as accord and satisfaction, leaving no surviving arbitral dispute. In a Section 11 request, the Court could examine whether the claim had already been concluded and whether coercion or undue influence was prima facie established. Because the allegation of coercion was unsupported by contemporaneous correspondence, specific pleadings, or prompt protest, it was found to be only a bald assertion raised in the affidavit. The objection based on full and final settlement therefore succeeded, and appointment of an arbitrator was refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307835