https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11391 Judicial scrutiny under Section 34 is narrowly confined to the statutory, record based grounds for setting aside an award, subject to strict time limits and a limited power to remit awards to the arbitral tribunal to eliminate defects. Courts must respect arbitral finality and refrain from reappraising factual findings or commercial judgments, intervening only where the enumerated grounds-such as incapacity, invalid arbitration agreement, procedural denial, matters beyond submission, non compliance with agreed procedure, non arbitrability, or conflict with public policy-are established. en-us Thu, 11 May 2023 16:43:49 +0530 Thu, 11 May 2023 16:43:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11391 Judicial scrutiny under Section 34 is narrowly confined to the statutory, record based grounds for setting aside an award, subject to strict time limits and a limited power to remit awards to the arbitral tribunal to eliminate defects. Courts must respect arbitral finality and refrain from reappraising factual findings or commercial judgments, intervening only where the enumerated grounds-such as incapacity, invalid arbitration agreement, procedural denial, matters beyond submission, non compliance with agreed procedure, non arbitrability, or conflict with public policy-are established. Articles Other Topics Thu, 11 May 2023 16:43:49 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11391