<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty Reduced for Fraudulent CENVAT Credit Claim u/r 26(2); Original Penalty Cut to 10% for Fairness.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69687</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty imposed on the appellant is above 50% of the credit taken by the set 2 units - the penalty imposed is excessively high. Hence for justice will be met if the set penalty is reduced to 10% of the penalty imposed on the appellant - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 11:10:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 11:10:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty Reduced for Fraudulent CENVAT Credit Claim u/r 26(2); Original Penalty Cut to 10% for Fairness.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69687</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty imposed on the appellant is above 50% of the credit taken by the set 2 units - the penalty imposed is excessively high. Hence for justice will be met if the set penalty is reduced to 10% of the penalty imposed on the appellant - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 11:10:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>