<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 829 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307824</link>
    <description>Receipts for granting non-exclusive, non-transferable access to database reports were held not to constitute royalty where no copyright or other intellectual property right was transferred; the treaty provision was treated as materially identical to the binding jurisdictional precedent, and the amount was therefore not taxable under the Act on a less favourable basis. The Tribunal also held that delay in pronouncing its order beyond 90 days could be justified by Covid-19 lockdown conditions, treating the lockdown period as excludable in computing the pronouncement time limit under the Tribunal Rules. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 10:22:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 829 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307824</link>
      <description>Receipts for granting non-exclusive, non-transferable access to database reports were held not to constitute royalty where no copyright or other intellectual property right was transferred; the treaty provision was treated as materially identical to the binding jurisdictional precedent, and the amount was therefore not taxable under the Act on a less favourable basis. The Tribunal also held that delay in pronouncing its order beyond 90 days could be justified by Covid-19 lockdown conditions, treating the lockdown period as excludable in computing the pronouncement time limit under the Tribunal Rules. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>