<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 56 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32685</link>
    <description>The court set aside previous orders and directed parties to appear before the Assessing Officer for further consideration. Regarding the deduction under Section 36(1)(vii), the court emphasized the need to demonstrate the debt as bad, irrecoverable, and written off in the previous year for the deduction to be valid. The judgment concluded with these observations, disposing of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 56 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32685</link>
      <description>The court set aside previous orders and directed parties to appear before the Assessing Officer for further consideration. Regarding the deduction under Section 36(1)(vii), the court emphasized the need to demonstrate the debt as bad, irrecoverable, and written off in the previous year for the deduction to be valid. The judgment concluded with these observations, disposing of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>