<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 409 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437602</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 7,81,648 made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue failed to disprove the assessee&#039;s claim that the cash was accumulated from agricultural activities, leading to the Tribunal concluding in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 409 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437602</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 7,81,648 made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue failed to disprove the assessee&#039;s claim that the cash was accumulated from agricultural activities, leading to the Tribunal concluding in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>