<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 402 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437595</link>
    <description>The article examines the definition of benami transaction under Sections 2(9)(A) and 2(9)(C), the distinction between substantive and procedural provisions, and the prospective or retrospective operation of amending legislation. It also addresses provisional attachment under Section 24, retrospective application of penal and confiscatory provisions, Article 20(1) protection against retrospective penal laws, in rem forfeiture of benami property, manifest arbitrariness, mens rea requirements in criminal offences, and proportionality in deprivation of property. The text notes that the issues are covered by the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Ganpati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. and that the petitions were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:28:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 402 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437595</link>
      <description>The article examines the definition of benami transaction under Sections 2(9)(A) and 2(9)(C), the distinction between substantive and procedural provisions, and the prospective or retrospective operation of amending legislation. It also addresses provisional attachment under Section 24, retrospective application of penal and confiscatory provisions, Article 20(1) protection against retrospective penal laws, in rem forfeiture of benami property, manifest arbitrariness, mens rea requirements in criminal offences, and proportionality in deprivation of property. The text notes that the issues are covered by the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Ganpati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. and that the petitions were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>