<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 16 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32682</link>
    <description>For computing book profit under Section 115J, &quot;loss&quot; in the proviso to Section 205(1)(b) of the Companies Act includes depreciation. The loss figure must therefore be determined after charging depreciation, and unabsorbed depreciation remains deductible from book profit even where business loss is lower than depreciation. Treating loss as exclusive of depreciation would conflict with the applicable Supreme Court interpretation and improperly deny the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 16 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32682</link>
      <description>For computing book profit under Section 115J, &quot;loss&quot; in the proviso to Section 205(1)(b) of the Companies Act includes depreciation. The loss figure must therefore be determined after charging depreciation, and unabsorbed depreciation remains deductible from book profit even where business loss is lower than depreciation. Treating loss as exclusive of depreciation would conflict with the applicable Supreme Court interpretation and improperly deny the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>