<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 377 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437570</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed certain appeals, setting aside orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving demands raised against vendors under Rule 10 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The Tribunal dismissed appeals deemed withdrawn due to settlements under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme. Penalties imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) were set aside based on legal provisions and the absence of merit in specific cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 08:45:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 377 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437570</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed certain appeals, setting aside orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving demands raised against vendors under Rule 10 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The Tribunal dismissed appeals deemed withdrawn due to settlements under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme. Penalties imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) were set aside based on legal provisions and the absence of merit in specific cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>