<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1357 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307815</link>
    <description>Where no variation in returned income or loss was proposed, the draft assessment procedure under section 144C(1) was inapplicable, so the assessment had to be completed within the ordinary limitation period under section 153. A draft assessment order issued later could not enlarge that statutory time limit. On those facts, the final assessment order passed after expiry of the prescribed period was time barred and quashed, with the issue decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 May 2023 21:17:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1357 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307815</link>
      <description>Where no variation in returned income or loss was proposed, the draft assessment procedure under section 144C(1) was inapplicable, so the assessment had to be completed within the ordinary limitation period under section 153. A draft assessment order issued later could not enlarge that statutory time limit. On those facts, the final assessment order passed after expiry of the prescribed period was time barred and quashed, with the issue decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>