<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 111 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32676</link>
    <description>The court held that the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Act was not justified as the appellant, a government-owned corporation, acted in good faith upon discovering the non-payment of service tax, promptly rectifying the situation. The court emphasized the appellant&#039;s proactive approach in discharging the tax liability and considered their status as a State Government Undertaking. Consequently, the penalty was set aside, and the original Adjudication Order was restored in favor of the appellant, granting the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 111 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32676</link>
      <description>The court held that the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Act was not justified as the appellant, a government-owned corporation, acted in good faith upon discovering the non-payment of service tax, promptly rectifying the situation. The court emphasized the appellant&#039;s proactive approach in discharging the tax liability and considered their status as a State Government Undertaking. Consequently, the penalty was set aside, and the original Adjudication Order was restored in favor of the appellant, granting the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>