<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 353 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437546</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part. It directed the Assessing Officer to allow the brokerage and transfer charges as genuine expenses connected with the asset transfer, considering net sale consideration for capital gain calculation. However, the disallowance of excess interest paid was upheld, as borrowing funds at a higher interest rate for non-business purposes was deemed diversionary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 353 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437546</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part. It directed the Assessing Officer to allow the brokerage and transfer charges as genuine expenses connected with the asset transfer, considering net sale consideration for capital gain calculation. However, the disallowance of excess interest paid was upheld, as borrowing funds at a higher interest rate for non-business purposes was deemed diversionary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>