<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 351 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437544</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that the dismissal of the appeal by the ld.CIT(A) was incorrect. The penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) for concealing income was unjustified as the addition was previously deleted by the ITAT. Consequently, the penalty was canceled, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 351 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437544</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that the dismissal of the appeal by the ld.CIT(A) was incorrect. The penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) for concealing income was unjustified as the addition was previously deleted by the ITAT. Consequently, the penalty was canceled, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>