<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 349 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437542</link>
    <description>The court ruled that the properties at 26, Sitaram Ghosh Street and 31, College Row were owned by Rani Bala Dutt as her stridhana property. The original Plaintiffs, claiming ownership, failed to prove their case, and the properties were confirmed as inherited by Paresh Chandra Dutt. The court ordered further proceedings for the remaining properties, denying relief to the Plaintiffs for the mentioned properties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 May 2023 08:06:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 349 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437542</link>
      <description>The court ruled that the properties at 26, Sitaram Ghosh Street and 31, College Row were owned by Rani Bala Dutt as her stridhana property. The original Plaintiffs, claiming ownership, failed to prove their case, and the properties were confirmed as inherited by Paresh Chandra Dutt. The court ordered further proceedings for the remaining properties, denying relief to the Plaintiffs for the mentioned properties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>