<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 324 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437517</link>
    <description>In complaints under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a quashing petition under Section 482 CrPC will not succeed where the complaint contains specific averments that the accused were involved in obtaining loans, executing loan documents, issuing cheques, or were otherwise responsible for the company&#039;s business. The court treated signatures on loan documents, board resolutions, and cheques as material supporting the allegations, and held that disputed issues such as resignation, genuineness of documents, and the exact extent of responsibility must be determined at trial. The summoning orders were therefore sustained and the prosecution was allowed to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 May 2023 08:05:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 324 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437517</link>
      <description>In complaints under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a quashing petition under Section 482 CrPC will not succeed where the complaint contains specific averments that the accused were involved in obtaining loans, executing loan documents, issuing cheques, or were otherwise responsible for the company&#039;s business. The court treated signatures on loan documents, board resolutions, and cheques as material supporting the allegations, and held that disputed issues such as resignation, genuineness of documents, and the exact extent of responsibility must be determined at trial. The summoning orders were therefore sustained and the prosecution was allowed to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>