<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1543 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307799</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) justified deleting the addition of Rs. 7593444 as unexplained credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2014-15. The Tribunal found the equity trading transaction genuine based on documentary evidence, including payment through bank and dematerialization of shares. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that the assessee provided all relevant details and evidence to support the transaction&#039;s genuineness. The deletion of commission paid for acquiring the accommodation entry was also upheld by the ITAT, leading to the dismissal of the addition. The High Court supported the ITAT&#039;s decision, resulting in the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 15:16:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1543 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307799</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) justified deleting the addition of Rs. 7593444 as unexplained credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2014-15. The Tribunal found the equity trading transaction genuine based on documentary evidence, including payment through bank and dematerialization of shares. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that the assessee provided all relevant details and evidence to support the transaction&#039;s genuineness. The deletion of commission paid for acquiring the accommodation entry was also upheld by the ITAT, leading to the dismissal of the addition. The High Court supported the ITAT&#039;s decision, resulting in the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>