<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 898 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307790</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in dismissing the appeal, confirming business income, and disallowing depreciation and various expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing sufficient cause to condone delays, finding the reasons provided by the assessee inadequate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 898 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307790</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in dismissing the appeal, confirming business income, and disallowing depreciation and various expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing sufficient cause to condone delays, finding the reasons provided by the assessee inadequate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>