https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307789 Prolonged detention of TADA undertrials in the face of trial delay was treated as raising Article 21 concerns, because the stringent bail regime under Section 20(8) assumed that trials would move without undue delay. To balance liberty and anti-terrorism interests, a pragmatic classification was adopted between hardcore offenders and those with less serious or derivative roles, and special one-time interim release directions were framed for eligible undertrials. The approach was coupled with directions for Review Committees to examine misuse of TADA and for courts to prioritise trial management and disposal. en-us Tue, 27 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Dec 2024 17:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307789 Prolonged detention of TADA undertrials in the face of trial delay was treated as raising Article 21 concerns, because the stringent bail regime under Section 20(8) assumed that trials would move without undue delay. To balance liberty and anti-terrorism interests, a pragmatic classification was adopted between hardcore offenders and those with less serious or derivative roles, and special one-time interim release directions were framed for eligible undertrials. The approach was coupled with directions for Review Committees to examine misuse of TADA and for courts to prioritise trial management and disposal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307789