https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307788 Condonation of inordinate delay of 272 days in filing a review petition was refused due to absence of a satisfactory explanation, resulting in dismissal of the petition on the ground of delay. Separately, the court found no arguable basis for reopening the earlier order on merits, concluding that the review did not disclose any error warranting interference and therefore dismissed the petition on merits as well. The decision records the supervisory rejection of delay condonation and the substantive refusal to entertain review relief. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jan 2026 14:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307788 Condonation of inordinate delay of 272 days in filing a review petition was refused due to absence of a satisfactory explanation, resulting in dismissal of the petition on the ground of delay. Separately, the court found no arguable basis for reopening the earlier order on merits, concluding that the review did not disclose any error warranting interference and therefore dismissed the petition on merits as well. The decision records the supervisory rejection of delay condonation and the substantive refusal to entertain review relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307788