https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32653 The court upheld the disallowance of expenditure under Rule 6D for employee tours by aggregating all tour expenses, ruled against the addition of duty drawback and cash assistance on accrual basis, allowed higher depreciation rate for the canteen building, denied deduction under section 80G following precedent, and rejected disallowance of expenditure on dealer advertisement under section 37(3A). The court disposed of the reference without costs. en-us Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32653 The court upheld the disallowance of expenditure under Rule 6D for employee tours by aggregating all tour expenses, ruled against the addition of duty drawback and cash assistance on accrual basis, allowed higher depreciation rate for the canteen building, denied deduction under section 80G following precedent, and rejected disallowance of expenditure on dealer advertisement under section 37(3A). The court disposed of the reference without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32653