<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 285 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437478</link>
    <description>The AAR, Gujarat ruled that architectural consultancy services provided to Surat Municipal Corporation for hospital construction qualify as pure services exempt from GST under notification 12/2017-Central (Rate). The authority determined that supply of drawings, samples, and physical models cannot be considered goods supply, making it a pure service. However, the AAR refused to rule on sub-contractor exemption matters, stating the applicant lacked locus standi to seek rulings on behalf of sub-contractors. The authority clarified that sub-contractors providing services to main contractors rather than directly to local authorities would not qualify for the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 285 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437478</link>
      <description>The AAR, Gujarat ruled that architectural consultancy services provided to Surat Municipal Corporation for hospital construction qualify as pure services exempt from GST under notification 12/2017-Central (Rate). The authority determined that supply of drawings, samples, and physical models cannot be considered goods supply, making it a pure service. However, the AAR refused to rule on sub-contractor exemption matters, stating the applicant lacked locus standi to seek rulings on behalf of sub-contractors. The authority clarified that sub-contractors providing services to main contractors rather than directly to local authorities would not qualify for the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>