<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 255 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT). The Tribunal held that the omission of section 92BA(i) implied it never existed, rendering any proceedings under it invalid. As a result, the Pr. CIT could not exercise jurisdiction under section 263 based on the repealed provision, leading to the appeal being allowed and the Pr. CIT&#039;s order being overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2023 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 255 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT). The Tribunal held that the omission of section 92BA(i) implied it never existed, rendering any proceedings under it invalid. As a result, the Pr. CIT could not exercise jurisdiction under section 263 based on the repealed provision, leading to the appeal being allowed and the Pr. CIT&#039;s order being overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>