<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 254 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437447</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the assessment order due to incorrect naming of the entity post-amalgamation. The decision was based on legal grounds, with no further assessment required. The judgment emphasized the importance of disclosing changes post-amalgamation for accurate tax assessment and quashed the assessment order in line with legal principles and precedents, ensuring proper application of tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 May 2023 10:09:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=712841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 254 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437447</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the assessment order due to incorrect naming of the entity post-amalgamation. The decision was based on legal grounds, with no further assessment required. The judgment emphasized the importance of disclosing changes post-amalgamation for accurate tax assessment and quashed the assessment order in line with legal principles and precedents, ensuring proper application of tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>