https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437443 At the summoning and quashing stage under Section 482 CrPC, the Court confined itself to whether a prima facie case existed and refused to assess the accused's defence. Contested factual questions about possession of the premises and the effect of the pleaded family arrangement were held unsuitable for determination in inherent jurisdiction. The Court noted that the applicant could raise those matters before the trial court by seeking discharge under the relevant criminal procedure provisions. On that basis, the challenge to the summoning order and complaint proceedings was rejected and the application was dismissed. en-us Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 May 2023 12:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437443 At the summoning and quashing stage under Section 482 CrPC, the Court confined itself to whether a prima facie case existed and refused to assess the accused's defence. Contested factual questions about possession of the premises and the effect of the pleaded family arrangement were held unsuitable for determination in inherent jurisdiction. The Court noted that the applicant could raise those matters before the trial court by seeking discharge under the relevant criminal procedure provisions. On that basis, the challenge to the summoning order and complaint proceedings was rejected and the application was dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437443